Pope says humanity needs 'saving' from homosexuality

Pope says humanity needs 'saving' from homosexuality - Telegraph

His remarks were immediately denounced as "totally irresponsible and unacceptable in any shape or form" by the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement.

Its chief executive, the Rev Sharon Ferguson, said: "It is more the case that we need to be saved from his comments. It is comments like this that justify homophobic bullying that goes on in schools and it is comments like this that justify gay bashing.

"There are still so many instances of people being killed around the world, including in western society, purely and simply because of their sexual orientation or their gender identity.

"When you have religious leaders like that making that sort of statement then followers feel they are justified in behaving in an aggressive and violent way because they feel that they are doing God's work in ridding the world of these people."

I absolutely HATE bringing attention to something so negative right here on the eve of our Advent celebration. Certainly there are more pleasant things to concentrate upon during this wonderful time of year. The Pope is Pope to all Catholics, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, many of whom struggle with their sexual disposition as it relates to the church. I would not expect anything different, in terms of ideology, from the Pope. However, I do not understand the choice to further ostracize a not so insignificant group of people who are often persecuted from within and without.

Obviously, the reaction by gay and lesbian groups is predictable and in my opinion, justified. In much of the world this debate is carried on in somewhat of a civilized manner; however, there are many Catholics living in societies that are much less civilized that would be very prone to use the Pope's rhetoric here to justify social cleansing of undesirables. How horrifying it would be if some group took the Pope's language as a mandate and even one gay, lesbian, or transgendered person was injured or killed. By virtue of his position as the Vicar of Christ, the representative of the man who loved sinners and publicans, ate with tax collectors and befriended prostitutes and Samaritans, Pope Benedict should chose his words more carefully and with more grace.

Another issue I have here is the dangerous theoretical separation between the saving of our environment and the protection and care of the human species. Our environment is on a fast track to annihilation and when this occurs, humankind as we know it will be no more. Consequently, saving the rain forest, protecting our planet against global warming and the wholesale destruction of our world by the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the like is, by very definition, attending to and safeguarding the very existence of humanity.

I would not want Pope Benedict's job for nothing, but if I had it I hope I would chose my remarks more carefully. The Catholic faith is one that I have grown to appreciate; its unique appeal to authority and its clarity on many issues, whether or not I agree with them or not, is often refreshing to me. Over the years I have grown to respect Papal authority in matters of faith and doctrine, but in this issue, I can not help but plead for the utilization of less exclusive language and care in issuing what could easily be mistaken as decrees by much of the world's population whose religious practices are often saturated with superstition, prejudice, and bigotry.

Many Poses, One Portrait: God defined by the World's Religions

My growing understanding of God as transcendent is fascinating to me. I think I am beginning to understand what Ghandi is saying here:

"After long study and experience, I have come to the conclusion that all religions are true; all religions have some error in them; all religions are almost as dear to me as my own Hinduism, in as much as all human beings should be as dear to one as one's own close relatives. My own veneration for other faiths is the same as that for my own faith; therefore no thought of conversion is possible." (M. K. Gandhi, All Men Are Brothers: Life and Thoughts of Mahatma Gandhi as told in his own words, Paris, UNESCO 1958, p 60.) [retrieved from Wikipedia article on Universalism]

If God transcends all human understanding, defies human language to define and articulate; if the human mind is limited in its ability to comprehend what God is, then how naive is it to believe that one religion is in and of itself capable of embodying all the truth that is God? Wow! Now there's a question for you!

As my personal understanding of the relevance of religion continues to expand, I am beginning to believe that not only are all the world's religions representations of this single transcendent being/force etc, but all of them are necessary to depict all that God is. Just as Ghandi says that all religions have errors, including his own in this indictment, all religions have some facet of truth which when unified, gives us a clearer and more comprehensive portrait of who God is; albeit, even this is an obscure portrait of the divine. However, with such an understanding, it behooves me to search for truth in all faiths, building as comprehensive a composite of the divine as possible.

I recently began reading a book that I've had on my shelf for sometime entitled, Listening to the Past by Stephen R. Holmes. This book seeks to validate the role of historical theology (Christian) and the importance of tradition in the development of Christian dogma. One thing that drew my attention to the book was a statement made on the back cover:

"...theology is an irreducibly communal task."

The idea that come to mind when I read this small statement is obviously not contextually accurate to what Holmes is trying to get at in the book. But, the statement is nonetheless applicable to the idea here that all religions bear the task of revealing the divine. It is, indeed, a communal task; from the world's inception to the present, the balance of man's search and pursuit of God as expressed in the world's religions is a communal effort to explain and reveal the One that transcends all things yet is immanent in all things as well.

I am sure that I have not done these thoughts justice. I do, however, hope that it has invoked some communal resolve to continue our quest to know God through the various faith perspectives of our fellow human inhabitants of this temporal space.

The Institute of Interfaith Dialog - Exploring Faiths

The Institute of Interfaith Dialog - Exploring Faiths


The link above takes you to the Institute for Interfaith Dialog where you can explore the beliefs of five of the world's major religions:

• Buddhism
• Christianity
• Hinduism
• Islam
• Judaism

This is a great concise resource for those wanting to know more about any of these faiths. These introductions provide enough information for one to embark on a spiritually enriching study of any one or all of these different faiths.

Can faith help heal our divide? - Opinion - USATODAY.com

Can faith help heal our divide? - Opinion - USATODAY.com

USA Today Columnist, Oliver  Thomas, makes the following statement while writing about the current divisions in America and the need for genuine Community: 

If genuine community is to occur, it will require sacrifice on the part of both winners and losers. Winners must be willing to reach across the chasm that divides us and welcome losers to choice seats at the table. Losers — rather than allowing themselves to steep in their bitterness, awaiting the first opportunity to pounce on the new president — must accept the responsibility of shared leadership. Of being the loyal opposition. John McCain set the tone for this beautifully on election night.Graciousness will be called for all around, as will be compromise — that essential lubricant of our life together. Ours is a world of half loaves, but alas, it is still bread.Here's the interesting thing. America's faith communities are well positioned to lead the way, to set the example for the rest of us. They are, after all, the places where millions of Americans go to find community. There, Republicans, Democrats and independents weekly kneel beside each other to acknowledge their shared humanity and their common commitment to a transcendent God and the truths that transcend our political and ideological differences. Truth. Justice. Love of neighbor.

He goes on to say:

While national leaders must set the proper tone, wars are won in the trenches. Local pastors, priests, imams and rabbis will be called upon to do much of the heavy lifting. For example, getting attached to one another might mean getting unattached to things. Clergy can remind us that the things that give our lives meaning rarely cost money. They do, however, cost. We will need to become better listeners. And less judgmental. We might even relax our grip on the notion that all of life must be adversarial. Perhaps cooperation, rather than competition, is the pathway to this new American dream.

Thomas makes some excellent points in this column. He asserts that we should learn to concentrate on those fundamental beliefs and needs that we all hold in common  rather than being divided by the things that we disagree upon. He contends that there is much work to do in the future of the United States and it can not be done without a deep sense of community and the responsibility to one another that such an understanding breeds. 

Communities of Faith can indeed help lead the way in this endeavor. I agree with Thomas that they are uniquely qualified to help the broader community to come together and pursue community building practices such as the Golden Rule. This will be good not only for our nation but for communities of faith as well. We all need to learn how to sit at the same table and listen to one another's concerns and ideas. Only then can we build a world conducive for everyone rather than a select few. 

Moving on up...

Well, I think I am about to win the award for the most unmanaged blog on Blogger. But, the move is complete and we are officially in our new home; new for us, that is, not new in general. Here are some pictures we took yesterday. I know this isn't a personal blog but surely some of you will enjoy. :) Flatter me a bit and I promise we will resume our regularly scheduled programming shortly.

You will notice that there are some tree pictures in the mix. These are in a cemetery right across the street from our house. It was cloudy and the pictures do not do justice to the beauty of these two trees. One is an evergreen and the other is an oak (I think). Both are rather unique to me because of their height, fatness, and overall symmetry. Trees in NC generally grow tall but lack the width seen in hardwoods in the Midwest. Both these trees are tall and wide which is why I love them. I can not wait to see the oak during the spring.